This is the second of several articles on poverty and
effective teaching.
Teachers and schools provide an oasis of stability for children who live in poverty. Schools provide two, and in some places, all hot meals that these children get. Teachers may be the only adults these children have contact with that encourage them to read, learn and think. Yet often it is these impoverished children that wind up in an administrator’s office for some infraction or another (Jensen, 2009, p. 19). Why? What can schools and teachers do to make learning something that these children strive for and expect from themselves? How can educators avoid losing these children to the streets where they are growing up?
As a researcher, I delved into the literature and found that there are three areas where we need to focus: early intervention, culture & climate, and teacher development.
Teachers and schools provide an oasis of stability for children who live in poverty. Schools provide two, and in some places, all hot meals that these children get. Teachers may be the only adults these children have contact with that encourage them to read, learn and think. Yet often it is these impoverished children that wind up in an administrator’s office for some infraction or another (Jensen, 2009, p. 19). Why? What can schools and teachers do to make learning something that these children strive for and expect from themselves? How can educators avoid losing these children to the streets where they are growing up?
As a researcher, I delved into the literature and found that there are three areas where we need to focus: early intervention, culture & climate, and teacher development.
Culture
and Climate
First, a learning community needs to examine the best way
to change the culture from passive to active. Literature on school
transformation and school culture far exceeds the limits of a blog post. To
help focus on transformative work this blogger sought one of the leading minds on
change in education, Dr. Michael Fullan.
Fullan (2001) states that while “moral purpose is job one, relationships
are job two because you can’t get anywhere without them” (p. 51). Developing collaborative and trusting
relationships is essential for students, parents and teachers, when a school is
trying to create a strong learning community. There are many things that can
hinder positive changes to schools. Ten years ago, Hinde (2004) examined school
culture and determined factors for and against change in school culture.
Factors that drive success include: sharing of
responsibility, willingness to experiment, believing that success will happen,
being able to trust the people you work with, having support that is both
intrinsic and extrinsic, involvement in decision making and transparency of
process (Hinde, 2004, p. 7). Boykin and
Noguera (2011) provide an example of believing success will happen showcasing
the work of University Park Campus School in Worcester Massachusetts, “the school
is steadfast in its mission to prepare every student for college” (p.161).
Support that is both intrinsic and extrinsic, with extra academic support being
provided internally and working in partnership with a local college makes a
difference for UPCS students (Boykin &Noguera, 2011, p. 162-163). However change is not always successful.
Factors that work against changing culture, in areas
where poverty is a problem include: leaders failing to develop the
relationships necessary to support change, or trying to pursue change in
isolation (Hinde, 2004, p. 8-9). Machtinger (2007) highlighted other factors in
his summary of the High Poverty Schooling
in America conference at
UNC-Chapel Hill in 2006. Factors that undermine success include: adverse social
policy, lack of economic opportunity, poor teacher quality, insufficient teaching
resources and a lack of good leadership in schools where poverty is
contributing to the achievement gap for students (Machtinger, 2007, p. 3-4).
From the literature then, good leadership includes: making
community connections, developing economic opportunity, driving change in social
policy, all of these are factors that help to develop culture and meaning in a learning
community. Students who live in poverty often feel that no one cares about them. Disenfranchisement from their community is an additional stress inducer for children. People (especially young people) need to feel connected. From the summit, teacher
quality is addressed as an issue for children who live in poverty. Effective teaching is the focus of the next
installment in this blog.
References
Boykin, A. W., & Noguera, P. (2011). Creating
the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the
achievement gap. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Fullan, M.
(2001). Leading in a culture
of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hinde, E.
(2004). School culture and change: An examination of the effects of school
culture on the process of change. Retrieved November 30, 2013, from http://usca.edu/essays/vol122004/hinde.pdf
Jensen, E. (2009). Teaching with poverty
in mind. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Machtinger, H.
(2007). What do we know about high poverty schools? Summary of the high poverty
schools conference at UNC-chapel hill. High School Journal, 90(3), 1-8.
No comments:
Post a Comment